Courts May Interpret Transmission Rights

Fortnightly Magazine - April 15 1996
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has declined jurisdiction in a dispute between Montana Power Co. and Puget Sound Power & Light Co. over a firm purchased-power contract and the seller's obligation to exert "best efforts" to secure necessary firm contractual rights to transmission service to complete the firm power transaction. The FERC prefers that the matter be heard in the federal district court in Montana, where related litigation is already pending. The FERC explained that it does not possess special expertise beyond that of a court on the issue in question, since its responsibilities would not compel a uniform interpretation of the language in the contract (Docket No. EL96-7-000).

Montana Power had sold firm power from its Colstrip plant to Puget Power, and had contracted with the Bonneville Power Administration to secure an adequate transmission path to ensure firm service. Puget Power terminated the contract, alleging a failure by the seller to secure and maintain contractual transmission rights.

40

Articles found on this page are available to Internet subscribers only. For more information about obtaining a username and password, please call our Customer Service Department at 1-800-368-5001.

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.