The Ohio Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has proposed regulations to allow electric utilities to use fuel-cost clauses to recover gains or losses from trading Clean Air Act emission allowances....
Firm-to-the-Wellhead Rates Make Comeback
Harkening back to the pre-Order 636 era, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has issued two orders approving firm-to-the-wellhead rates for Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. (Docket Nos. RP92-137-016 and RP93-136-000) and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. (Docket Nos. RP91-203-000 and RP92-132-000).
In initial decisions, one administrative law judge had approved firm-to-the-wellhead rates in the Tennessee case; another had deemed them anticompetitive in the Transco case. Shippers argued that allowing such rates would limit the customer choice promoted in Order 636.
Although not totally pleased with firm-to-the-wellhead rates, the FERC approved them anyway. Commissioner William L. Massey dissented in part in the Tennessee case, stating that such rates are not "the wave of the future," but rather a "relic." Chair Elizabeth A. Moler said that, to her mind, the cases stand for the proposition that such rates are viable as long as pipelines have a capacity-release program in place.
Articles found on this page are available to Internet subscribers only. For more information about obtaining a username and password, please call our Customer Service Department at 1-800-368-5001.