Nuclear Closures

Deck: 

Where is the Public Interest?

Fortnightly Magazine - June 2017
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

Debates rage in state houses across the country about subsidizing the weakening nuclear power industry. Not for new nuclear plants, but rather subsidies to prevent the early retirement of existing nuclear power stations.

The nuclear industry claims that the low market price for electricity makes it uneconomical for them to continue to operate. The culprit? Low prices and electricity generated by abundant natural gas.

In one corner is the nuclear industry talking about its zero-emission production of electricity and in the other is the natural gas industry calling for free-market outcomes. This debate needs to be broader than "competitive markets" versus "clean energy." Even according to Adam Smith, public policy starts where markets fail.

The most basic electric utility integrated resource planning recognizes that least cost is not the correct metric. We should look at lowest reasonable cost, subject to certain constraints - like environmental stewardship.

More sophisticated integrated resource planning would insert risk management into the process and look at expected costs. Consider the probability that there will be some fee for carbon consumption or that natural gas prices will increase.

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.