First came the Pool, with its faults and virtues.
Now comes a wave of troubling takeovers.
What happens when retail supply opens up?
Much of the pressure to reform the...
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court has asked the state Public Utility Commission (PUC) to explain 1) why it disallowed a substantial portion of advertising costs in setting rates for National Fuel Gas Corp., a local distribution company (LDC); and 2) why it had rejected the LDC's request for a separate inflation adjustment of 2.58 percent for 17 cost elements.
The court found the PUC's rationale (em that the LDC's advertising was "in essence targeted to seek and retain load" (em insufficient, since recovery of costs associated with similar advertisements had been allowed in previous cases. The court also pointed out that the PUC had approved comparable inflation adjustments in prior cases without specifically requiring a definitive study of the relationship between inflation and each item adjusted in the past. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, No. 43 C.D.1995, 1996 WL 272327, May 23, 1996 (Pa.Commw.Ct.).
Articles found on this page are available to Internet subscribers only. For more information about obtaining a username and password, please call our Customer Service Department at 1-800-368-5001.