About 30 states have begun (em
either through the legislature, the utility commission, informal working groups, or some combination of these (em to consider issues such as retail wheeling,...
one that brought you." In electric restructuring, the IPP represented the new kid on the block. Yet, this new suitor may vanish from the scene unless regulators take action. Unless the courts adopt a sui generis approach to the established rules governing "predatory pricing," regulators will find themselves unable to safely cede their active oversight to the antitrust cop on the beat.
In the long run, industries naturally assume the optimal size for the market. Predatory pricing flourishes only in the short term, during periods of market upheaval, such as that now occurring in the electric service industry. During this period, at least while stranded costs are recovered (and perhaps as the quid pro quo for stranded-cost recovery), regulators might consider affirmative action to mitigate price predation that may prove economically undesirable in the long run. t
Stephen L. Teichler is a partner in law firm of Metzger, Hollis, Gordon & Alprin (based in Washington, DC), which represented Hitachi in the Matsushita antitrust litigation.
Articles found on this page are available to Internet subscribers only. For more information about obtaining a username and password, please call our Customer Service Department at 1-800-368-5001.