Frontlines

Deck: 
FERC's California plan needs pressing, to fix blatant gaffes on NO<sub>x</sub>, demand bids, and megawatt laundering.
Fortnightly Magazine - July 1 2001
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

Frontlines

Taken to the Cleaners

 

 

FERC's California plan needs pressing, to fix blatant gaffes on NOx, demand bids, and megawatt laundering.

You're a federal utility regulator. You want to place a ceiling on electricity prices paid to power producers in California, but you don't want to impose those evil price caps. No sir.

So you set a proxy price for a hypothetical competitive market, based on what you think are reasonable costs for operating a typical power plant, like thermal efficiency (plant heat rate) and buying natural gas for fuel. Then add $2 for miscellaneous operating and maintenance expense. That should do it.

But something goes wrong. After you've written your ratemaking order, have seen it hit the street, you discover that one of your cost categories--the cost of purchasing emissions allowances to meet environmental requirements--isn't even a cost any more. While you had your back turned, two or three months earlier, that darned governor out in California granted a reprieve to power plants designed to bring more supply to the market. He freed local generators from having to buy additional emissions credits for nitrogen oxides (NOx) for each hour of operations, but your fellow regulators somehow remained clueless.

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.