Mail

Deck: 
More ruminations on the "stranded ratepayer."
Fortnightly Magazine - July 1 2001
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

Mail

 

More ruminations on the "stranded ratepayer."

In "Stranded Ratepayers? I Respectfully Disagree" (June 1, 2001, p. 14), Alfred Kahn observes: "The movement [to electricity deregulation] became powerful only during the period in the middle and late 1990s and only in those jurisdictions in which ... regulated rates, based on book costs, appeared to be far above competitive levels. At those times, and in those places, it was not the utility companies, but regulators and legislators who began to insist on deregulation." Kahn's observation is accurate, but in my view, requires a footnote.

The seeds of competition were sown, ironically, in the 1970s—a period in which, as Kahn notes, "regulation held rates markedly below what would have been competitive levels." In that period, many utility commissions allocated costs, perhaps arbitrarily and at least novelly, to shift a disproportionate share of rate increases to large industrial users. By the mid 1980s, for many reasons, that game was exhausted.

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.