Revisiting the Regulatory Paradigm

Deck: 

Where Do DERs Fit In?

Fortnightly Magazine - September 2017
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

Distributed Energy Resources are problem children. Historically, regulators have considered three categories of expenses for rate-making purposes: generation, transmission, and distribution. Other factors, such as administrative overhead and research, have essentially been subsumed under the broad category that they serve.

Legislators and regulators increasingly are discussing among ourselves and with organizations such as the Department of Energy whether a fourth category should be clearly established. Initially these discussions focused on energy storage because storage can be a "consumer" of generation, as well as a "generator," and can also alleviate transmission and distribution system constraints. In other words, storage can serve each of the three categories individually and more interestingly, serve combinations of the regulatory categories simultaneously.

Lately the discussions have expanded. Are storage devices, distributed generation, demand response, energy conservation or efficiency sufficiently diverse, interactive, comprehensive in scope, and sufficient in number to warrant designation as a new Distributed Energy Resources regulatory category?

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.