High Court Takes Heat Out of Mercury Rule
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency must – first – consider the costs of compliance before fixing a specific cap on mercury emissions. What’s next?
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency must – first – consider the costs of compliance before fixing a specific cap on mercury emissions. What’s next?
Today's Court Ruling: High Court Takes Heat Out of Mercury Rule
A decade ago, America’s life changed. That’s when the country began to reap the benefits of unconventional oil and natural gas, making it the world’s largest such producer.
Not only had the nation found itself awash in a cleaner burning generation fuel but it had also started attracting new investment in the chemical and manufacturing sectors. It’s truly been a win-win scenario as the United States has both brightened its economic prospects while also cleaned its environment, having reduced its carbon emissions by 10 percent from 2005 levels.
The Environmental Protection Agency’s recent study on hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) appears really as just a careful continuation of what it has been saying all along – that the drilling techniques used to retrieve shale gas are pretty safe. Thus, while it hedged a little, EPA emphasized that there’s no “widespread” problems associated with fracking and drinking water supplies.
When most people think of Georgia and energy, they think of Southern Company and coal. Well, all that’s changing now that the state is about to embrace a new law on July 1 to allow utilities to sell rooftop solar energy.