Fortnightly
S. A. Van Vactor and F. H. Pickel
Docket No. EL01-47-000, Mar. 14, 2001 (F.E.R.C.).-L.A.B
Calif. PUC Application 99-08-022, proposed decisions by Barnett (Aug. 2, 2000), Neeper (Sept. 19, 2000), and Bilas (Nov. 6, 2000)
According to the solar industry, a U.S. appeals court decisionand a Southern California Edison petition pending at the FERCmight put them out of business.
Carl J. Levesque
News Analysis
According to the solar industry, a U.S. appeals court decisionand a Southern California Edison petition pending at the FERCmight put them out of business.
"If Edison were to prevail in this, it would have hugely negative implications for the solar operators."
PUC Oversight: Panacea or New Problem?
Docket No. ER97-2353-000, Opinion No. 447, 92 FERC ¶61,169, Aug. 17, 2000
Docket Nos. EL00-46-000 et al., 91 FERC ¶61,276, June 14, 2000.
Transmission & ISOs
FERC Docket No. ER97-1523-040, filed April 18, 2000.
Mergers & Acquisitions
Docket No. EC00-26-000, 91 FERC ¶61,036, April 12, 2000.
Pages