Smart Grid Dilemma

Deck: 

Concerned stakeholders seek an equitable cost-benefit ratio for all ratepayers.

Fortnightly Magazine - August 2013
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

A successful smart grid business case requires utilities to demonstrate to stakeholders that benefits outweigh costs and that there’s a positive return-on-investment (ROI) at the end of the rainbow. A wide diversity of stakeholders means that many see costs, benefits, and ROI from different perspectives, which leads to a sleeper issue that could become a veritable brick wall to some utilities that contemplating smart grid modernization.

Specifically, if utilities can’t make a convincing cost-benefit case for all economic strata of residential ratepayers, then utility regulators, consumer advocates, and ratepayers themselves will increasingly question the value of grid modernization. 

With the economics of the DOE Smart Grid Investment Grant projects now coming to light – and in many cases, lacking hard-dollar quantification of benefits – public utility commissions and municipal electric utility departments are grappling with this issue and the notion of equitable costs and benefits for all. 

Breaking with the Past

In the past, the cost of improvements to the grid were borne by all residential ratepayers through the imposition of rate increases. This approach served us in the 20th century as it extended and improved electric service to the greatest number of citizens at the lowest possible price. 

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.