IPP Fights Utility Curtailment

Fortnightly Magazine - August 1996
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

A federal judge has dismissed an antitrust lawsuit brought against Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. (PPL) in 1995 by Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc. (SER), an independent power producer. SER alleged that PPL's curtailment of electrical output from SER during "minimum generation emergencies" on the regional power pool violated federal antitrust laws.

Download Free Copy of Lewis Latimer Book

[A minimum generation emergency is declared by the pool when low amounts of electricity are being used by customers. To ensure the safety of the power system during those times, members must cut back or shut down power generators.]

SER has filed an appeal in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. According to Richard L. Caplan, SER attorney, "Had evidence been allowed, we would have proved that ratepayers will be harmed by PPL's anticompetitive conduct." SER charges that PPL has excessively curtailed purchases, as many as 83 times during a one-year span, in violation of the Sherman Act.

10

Articles found on this page are available to Internet subscribers only. For more information about obtaining a username and password, please call our Customer Service Department at 1-800-368-5001.

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.