$9 Billion at Risk

Deck: 

If PJM markets should lose demand response as a capacity resource.

Fortnightly Magazine - November 2014
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

December 16, 2014. Remember the date. For, unless the U.S. Supreme Court agrees to step in to mediate, that likely marks the last day for the stay of execution that till now has delayed any enforcement of EPSA v. FERC. That's the case, decided this past spring, which struck down Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Order 745, governing how much to pay electric consumers who agree to curtail their power usage through demand response (DR) to help balance supply and load. Such payments, the court said, lie outside FERC's jurisdiction over wholesale energy markets:

"Demand response - simply put - is part of the retail market."

That ruling came as a bombshell. But there's more. First­Energy now has dared FERC to go one better: to extend the EPSA rationale to apply not only to wholesale energy markets, but also to capacity markets run by PJM, the regional grid operator for the Mid-Atlantic states, and perhaps other grid regions, such as the New York or the New England ISO.

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.