FERC's Dedication to Competition Results in Bureaucracy and Intervention

Deck: 

Setting Rules Without Platonic Ideal of Competition

Fortnightly Magazine - July 2018
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has a philosophical inclination toward markets and attempts to shoe-horn "competitive" approaches into the electric sector wherever it can. This devotion to competition unintentionally adds complexity to transactions and limits the opportunity to develop independent power projects destined for purchase by investor-owned utilities in vertically-integrated states.

It may also catalyze the unraveling of the electric markets in restructured states.

FERC's affinity for competition can, ironically, undermine competitive procurement in vertically-integrated states. As part of an integrated planning exercise, utilities often undertake a competitive request for proposals process and select projects based on that RFP.

The selected projects must still run the gauntlet of a FERC-governed generator interconnection queue. This queue can delay projects due to nascent or speculative projects holding queued positions without any promise of being built.

FERC tries to address the risks of speculative projects, by allowing transmission operators to bump a project from a queued position if it does not meet the proscribed element. This too adds compliance and development risk to these projects.

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.