FERC Asked to Reconsider Avoided-cost Order

Fortnightly Magazine - October 1 1995
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

Metropolitan Edison Co. (ME) and Pennsylvania Electric Co. (PE), subsidiaries of General Public Utilities Corp. (GPU), have asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for rehearing on parts of its July 6 order, which the two companies had challenged under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act in Pennsylvania (Docket No. EL95-41-000).

Specifically, the utilities had challenged the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission's (PUC's) method of using a coal plant proxy to calculate a default level of avoided costs. The PUC found the issue moot, but claimed its regulations require that all alternate sources of electric energy be taken into account. The utilities asked the FERC to:

1) Reconsider its refusal to invalidate the PUC's method of determining whether the developer of a qualifying facility developer has a legal obligation to supply power

Recharge the Economy with Renewable Energy Tax Credits

2) Recognize that contract prices with two projects were biased by the PUC's threatened imposition of an invalid, single-source proxy that would have set even higher prices

3) Require the PUC to respect competitive bidding procedures and to stop relying on stale data when figuring avoided costs. t

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.