How rules muted price signals and did not ensure efficient siting.
Of the new rules proposed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for interconnecting new power plants to the transmission grid, the most controversial (for transmission providers and generators alike) is FERC's choice of who should pay to construct the various categories of required new facilities.
Some transmission providers argue that interconnecting generators should pay the full costs of all transmission upgrades that are required to interconnect a new generator to the power grid, and which would not be required for grid expansion (to meet load growth, for instance) absent the new generation project.
Generators claim, however, that their presence on the grid benefits all power customers-through increased competition, lower energy costs, etc.-so that all transmission customers should share in paying grid upgrade costs.
The FERC, meanwhile, takes a middle course, but one that seems more offensive to grid owners than gen project developers.
Gen Interconnection: Lessons From New England
Deck:
How rules muted price signals and did not ensure efficient siting.
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.