Reliability vs. Resiliency

Deck: 

Prevent problems, or wait and respond when something happens?

Fortnightly Magazine - July 2014
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

Whenever I sit down to write about electric reliability, my thoughts always race back to the time, more than a dozen years ago now, that I inadvertently interfered with the workings of NERC, then known as the North American Electric Reliability Council, on a day of dire emergency that would test the resiliency of both the electric industry and our country.

It all started in the summer of 2001, when then, as now, I was toiling away as editor of Public Utilities Fortnightly.

In my Frontlines column on page 6, in our issue of July 15, 2001 (we published twice a month back then), I had run a graphic of an impossibly convoluted organizational flow chart that had illustrated a ten-step process that NERC had designed for proposing, reviewing, and adopting new reliability standards. My aim was to show how deeply that NERC was hopelessly ensnared in bureaucratic procedures.

And I succeeded, after a fashion.

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.